Introduction
The return of Strictly Come Dancing for its twenty-third series in 2025 was less a triumphant revival of national feel-good television and more a strategic re-entry into a ballroom still shadowed by scandal. Positioned as the BBC’s flagship comfort watch, the show’s latest celebrity cohort arrived not just to learn the Cha-Cha-Cha, but to navigate a minefield of prior welfare controversies and unprecedented political divisiveness. This season’s complexity is rooted in the strategic tension between its public service broadcasting mission and the naked pursuit of controversial, tabloid-driving engagement. The Integrity Crisis: A Ballroom Under Investigation The true complexity of the 2025 cast is that their tenure began under the shadow of a professional dancer integrity crisis. Following the acrimonious departures of star professionals Giovanni Pernice and Graziano Di Prima in 2024—the former after the BBC upheld complaints of verbal bullying and harassment from celebrity partner Amanda Abbington, the latter over an alleged physical incident in rehearsals—the show was forced into a highly public overhaul of its welfare procedures. This crisis dictated the environmental constraints of the new series. The BBC, citing the need to address concerns that "have arisen in recent months," mandated three key structural changes, most notably the requirement for a chaperoned team member to be present during training room rehearsals at all times.
Main Content
This move, while necessary and long overdue, fundamentally altered the dynamic of the celebrity-pro relationship, shifting it from a private mentorship into a monitored working relationship. Investigative reporting questioned why such safeguarding measures were not standard practice sooner, particularly in the post-Me Too era. The 2025 cast, therefore, performs under a cloud of accountability that previous cohorts were never subjected to, fundamentally changing the narrative from pure escapism to cautious participation. The Calculated Conflict: Casting the Divisive Figure The most contentious layer of the 2025 line-up was the inclusion of Thomas Skinner, the businessman and former Apprentice contestant whose public persona had pivoted toward right-wing commentary. Critiques published in outlets such as The Guardian labeled his casting as an instance of "right-wing grifting," a calculated effort by producers to court viral buzz and engage with the political culture war. Skinner’s presence, marked by associations with US conservative figures and divisive comments regarding social issues, drew immediate public backlash, including calls for his removal. The controversy was further fueled by personal scandals, including an alleged affair, ensuring he dominated the pre-series narrative.
The BBC’s decision to feature a figure whose public discourse directly conflicts with the show’s progressive platform—which in recent years has championed same-sex pairings and groundbreaking inclusivity—highlights a worrying prioritisation of noise over message. While Skinner’s brief tenure was cut short by an early elimination, the strategic risk taken to cast him fundamentally complicated the show's image, suggesting that controversy is now a feature, not a bug, of the casting process. Progress and Pragmatism: The Diversity Dichotomy To view the 2025 cast as purely cynical, however, is to ignore its genuinely groundbreaking elements. This series continued Strictly's role as a pioneer in representation through the casting of model Ellie Goldstein, the first person with Down syndrome to compete on the main show, and drag queen La Voix, reinforcing the show’s long-standing commitment to the LGBTQ+ community. This dichotomy is the true complexity of the 2025 selection. The show simultaneously embraces the uplifting, community-building spirit of inclusion (Ellie Goldstein) while hedging its commercial bets on politically polarizing figures (Thomas Skinner). As one analysis noted, this "muddles" the show's messaging, forcing viewers to reconcile the emotional, escapist fantasy of the ballroom with the harsh, immediate realities of contemporary celebrity politics.
It poses a crucial question for the public broadcaster: Can the integrity gained through meaningful representation outweigh the damage caused by courting controversy for ratings? The cast, therefore, serves as a microcosm of modern media's struggle to be both meaningful and commercially viable in a fragmented attention economy. Conclusion The Strictly Come Dancing 2025 cast stands as a testament to the show's continued cultural relevance, but also to the complex commercial calculus that governs its production. The structural changes implemented after the 2024 welfare scandal, coupled with the strategic selection of both genuinely diverse and deliberately divisive figures, defines Series 23 as an exercise in balancing integrity with spectacle. The broader implication is that even the most cherished 'national treasure' television must now engage with the culture wars, sacrificing a degree of its universally beloved status in exchange for media oxygen. The real investigation moving forward is not merely who can dance, but at what cost the BBC is willing to secure its place in the saturated spotlight.
Conclusion
This comprehensive guide about strictly come dancing cast 2025 provides valuable insights and information. Stay tuned for more updates and related content.
